Assessing the Science Curriculum
Formative Assessment in Science
We recommend that schools adopt whole class feedback when formatively assessing students’ written work. The approach is outlined in this short pre-recorded CPD session and the accompanying resources can be found here.
Weekly fluency quizzes are an effective method of identifying and consolidating core knowledge and skills. Here is a short pre-recorded CPD session and with accompanying resources here, outlining how fluency quizzing can be used by teachers to identify and address gaps in working scientifically.
All lessons have ‘Do Now’, and these are mostly made of knowledge retrieval questions selected to cover relevant prior knowledge for the lesson. Teachers are expected to adapt these to meet any assessed gaps in knowledge, and they are intended to be part of a wider retrieval practice regime set by the school, for example using the knowledge organisers available for each topic.
All lessons have mark schemes, model answers or success criteria for all written work and it is expected that teachers ensure that students self assess and make corrections to their work based on these.
The Key Stage 3 curriculum has been divided into a series of statements to support formative assessment, called Key Performance Indicators (KPIs). KPIs are a summary of what a student should be able to do by the end of a topic, having been taught the curriculum content. There are also KPIs for working scientifically, which are intended to be assessed throughout the key stage.
There are editable tasks for each KPI, which schools can use to formatively assess students’ progress against the KPIs. This applies to the Key Stage 3 ‘required’ practicals, where there are tasks to assess students work against the WS KPIs. There is no requirement for schools to track or report the KPIs.
Summative Assessment in Science
The summative assessment provided includes three types of assessment: optional topic tests, optional mixed-topic tests, and compulsory end of year exams.
Topic tests have been produced for each topic – all are approximately 50 marks and include the elements of working scientifically that have been developed during the unit, in addition to the specified content for that unit. Schools may adapt these as they see fit.
Alternatively, if a school prefers to adopt a mixed topic testing approach there is a parallel set of summative tests to support this. These tests follow the suggested route, and a grid of how this might look can be found in Appendix C.
The mixed-topic tests will contain an approximate mix 75%:25% split of current content to previously taught content. As part of this approach, there is an optional mid-year assessment (but no United Learning wide data collection).
The topic tests and mixed-topic tests are intended to be parallel summative assessment regimes, and as such, the pool of questions from which each is drawn is the same. This means that schools should follow either the topic testing route or the mixed-topic testing route. Adopting a mixture of the two approaches carries a risk of students meeting the same question more than once. All tests are editable, except for the end of year exams.
End of year exams are written for each of Year 7, 8 and 9, and these are not editable and are compulsory for all United Learning Academies. The end of year exams can be sat by students in the testing window as specified in the United Learning Assessment Calendar.
Recovery and Catch-up in Science
Students requiring catch up can be identified via internal assessment data or end of year exams. In addition, all students will likely have some gaps from lockdown learning that will require a form of catch up. There is likely considerable variation in the amount and nature of the curriculum that needs catching up in different students. Therefore, if this is the case for your school, we do not recommend specific catch up units at the beginning of term as these are unlikely to be well-targeted. The general approach we recommend is as follows:
- Teach the curriculum and formatively assess relevant prior knowledge as students progress through the curriculum, addressing gaps throughout the course of the year in the context of related topics.
- Use weekly fluency quizzes to identify gaps in fundamentals with teachers planning associated activities based on that information to address any identified gaps in lessons.
- Use whole class feedback to identify common gaps that can be closed in the feedback review lessons that should follow every piece of whole class feedback.
- Map additional ‘pause point’ lessons into the curriculum throughout the year to reteach fundamental knowledge, with working scientifically weaved into these (this is an area that online learning has likely neglected).